点击右上角
微信好友
朋友圈
请使用浏览器分享功能进行分享
吉林省市场监管厅开展烟花爆竹等重点工业产品质量安全专项整治******
为保障人民群众健康安全消费，营造欢乐、祥和、平安节日氛围，吉林省市场监管厅突出“四个加强”，在全省范围开展全覆盖拉网式排查，强化烟花爆竹、危化品等重点工业产品质量安全隐患排查整治，坚决防范和遏制产品质量安全事故的发生。
加强督导检查
由厅领导带队组成督导检查组，深入全省各地督促属地提高政治站位、严格落实监管责任，指导各地市场监管部门组织开展产品质量安全专项检查督查工作，确保安全整治工作横向到边、纵向到底，坚决消除盲点，不留死角、不打折扣落实监管责任。在督促辖区内相关企业切实落实安全生产主体责任基础上，指导企业深入自查，建立质量问题约谈和处理督导机制，压实属地监管和企业主体责任，严厉查处无出厂检验证明、偷工减料、质量低劣等重点问题。及时协调解决重点难点问题，对检查中发现的风险隐患逐一登记建档，强化整改落实。
加强源头监管
各级市场监管部门聚焦危险化学品企业，精准梳理排查所辖企业状况，采取“监管人员+技术专家”模式，全覆盖落实溶解乙炔、工业过氧化氢等10类质量安全风险较高的危险化学品获证企业现场监督检查。以持续保持获证条件为重点，重点检查关键原材料、生产过程、出厂检查等关键质量控制点是否到位，生产场所、生产设备、检验设备等是否符合相关规定要求，深入调查生产企业是否存在偷工减料等违法行为，严厉打击生产假冒伪劣产品及无证生产等违法行为。
加强质量抽查
全省部署开展烟花爆竹、成品油等产品专项监督抽查800批次，抽查区域覆盖全省各地，重点抽检城乡接合部和农村市场，对产品标识、火药量、燃烧性能、抗爆指数、硫含量等安全指标进行重点检测。对于发现的不合格产品，各地市场监管部门要严格依据《中华人民共和国产品质量法》《产品质量监督抽查管理暂行办法》，第一时间组织开展结果处理，加大执法力度，严防不合格产品流入市场。加强对非医用口罩、燃气用具、电动自行车等防疫用品和涉及民生安全用品的质量安全监管，严厉查处无 CCC认证证书、无出厂检验证明等违法问题。
加强隐患整改
各地市场监管部门认真梳理以往监管信息，以危化品、危化品车载常压罐体、电线电缆、建筑用钢筋、水泥等工业产品生产许可证获证企业为重点，针对近两年发现的质量管理存在的问题，组织开展“回头看”“反复查”工作。深化产品质量安全排查治理工作，督促企业严格履行《中华人民共和国产品质量法》规定的责任义务，自觉扛起消除风险的责任。采取有效措施打通企业整改、消除隐患“最后一公里”，防止已处置的风险隐患死灰复燃，实现防范增量风险、严控变量风险的目标。
中国吉林网 吉刻APP记者刘赜瑞
图片来源：吉林省市场监管厅
中新网评：处理核污水绝不是日本自家私事******
中新网北京1月19日电(蒋鲤)日本政府近日称，将于2023年春夏期间开始向海洋排放经过处理的福岛第一核电站核污水。日本罔顾国内民众及周边国家的屡屡反对，企图将核污水“一倒了之”，把一件关乎全球海洋生态环境和公众健康的事当成了自家私事。
资料图：日本福岛第一核电站。2011年，福岛核电站事故发生后，大量放射性物质泄漏到大气层和太平洋，对周围环境造成了难以逆转的伤害，数十万人被迫撤离该地区。时至今日，作为日本邻国之一的韩国仍未解除福岛海鲜禁令。
日本以核污水存储能力即将达到上限为由，在2021年4月13日，正式决定将福岛第一核电站核污水排入太平洋。过去一年多，日本政府和东京电力公司一直在持续推进核污水排海计划。
日本政府辩称，这些核污水经多核素处理系统(ALPS)处理后很安全，甚至“可以喝”，这样的表态无疑在愚弄大众。
事实上，经过处理的核污水仍含有多种放射性物质，核污水一旦排放入海就无法回收，长期来看，将会给海洋生态带来难以估量的潜在威胁，最终危害人类健康。
因此，核污水排海计划推出后，遭到日本民众强烈反对。日本《朝日新闻》2022年3月公布的问卷调查显示，福岛县、宫城县和岩手县受访的42个市町村长中，约六成反对东京电力公司福岛第一核电站核污水排放入海。日本全国渔业协会联合会也多次申明立场，反对该计划。
日本政府认为，核污水排海是最便宜、最省事的解决方案，但此举却将周边国家乃至全世界置于核污染风险中。太平洋非日本一家之海，核污水会随着洋流流动，其影响势必会跨越国界，危害周边国家乃至整个国际社会的公共福祉和利益。
《韩国经济新闻》发文称，相关研究认为，福岛核污水如果排放入海，约7个月后将到达济州等韩国海域，该国水产业和旅游业将遭受相当大的损失。
德国南极海洋机构也曾发出警告，若日本将所有核污水排入海中，不到半年，整个太平洋都将面临高度辐射威胁，包括远在大洋另一端的美国。太平洋地区人民更是对日本该计划持反对意见。
日本作为《联合国海洋法公约》缔约国，有义务保护海洋环境。然而，在核污水排海方案的正当性、核污水数据的可靠性、净化装置的有效性、环境影响的不确定性等问题上，日本未能作出科学、可信的说明。
国际原子能机构技术工作组虽已三次赴日实地考察评估，但尚未就日排海方案的安全性给出结论，并且对日本提出诸多澄清要求和整改意见。在此情况下，日本仍执意推进核污水排海工程建设，这是极不负责任的行为。
太平洋不是日本的下水道，日本必须正视各方合理关切，在与周边国家等相关利益方和国际原子能机构充分协商后，制定合理的核污水处理方案。日本也要着眼长远，若只顾眼前，执意将核污水排放入海，不仅其自身，周边国家乃至全世界都将为之买单，其后果必将会危害数代人。
Fukushima water disposal by no means Japan’s own business
By John Lee
(ECNS) -- Japan has announced it will release treated wastewater from the wrecked Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Plant into the Pacific Ocean this year.
Although Fukushima wastewater disposal affects global marine ecological environment protection and public health, Japan has turned a deaf ear to domestic and international opposition to dumping the contaminated water into the sea, treating the "global" matter as its own business.
The Fukushima accident in 2011 had sent large quantities of radiation into the atmosphere and the Pacific Ocean, causing irreversible damage to the surrounding environment, and hundreds of thousands of people were forced to evacuate the area. South Korea still maintains its import ban on Japanese seafood from areas affected by the Fukushima nuclear disaster.
On April 13, 2021, Japan announced it had decided to discharge contaminated radioactive wastewater in Fukushima Prefecture into the sea due to dwindling storage space, with the Japanese government and plant operator Tokyo Electric Power Company Holdings Inc. promoting the release plan over the past year.
The Japanese government argues that the water treated by an advanced liquid processing system, or ALPS, is safe and drinkable, which is undoubtedly fooling the public.
In fact, the treated wastewater still includes a variety of radioactive substances and can’t be recycled once discharged into the sea, which will pose a great threat to marine ecology and ultimately endanger human health in the long run.
Therefore, the discharge plan has been strongly opposed in Japan. According to a questionnaire conducted by The Asahi Shimbun, nearly 60 percent of mayors of 42 municipalities in Iwate, Miyagi and Fukushima prefectures oppose the discharge plan. The National Fisheries Cooperative Federation of Japan has also repeatedly stated its opposition in public.
The Japanese government believes that dumping Fukushima wastewater into the sea is the cheapest and most convenient solution, but neighboring countries and even the whole world will be at risk of nuclear pollution.
The Pacific Ocean doesn’t belong to Japan and the wastewater flow along oceanic currents will surely break boundaries and endanger public welfare and the interests of neighboring countries and even the international community.
The Korea Economic Daily reported that related research concluded that if contaminated water from Fukushima is released into the ocean, it would only take seven months for the contaminated water to reach the shores of Jeju Island, with the country's aquaculture and tourism suffering considerable losses.
According to the calculation of a German marine scientific research institute, radioactive materials will spread to most of the Pacific Ocean within half a year from the date of discharge, and the U.S. and Canada will be affected by nuclear pollution. People in the Pacific region also oppose the discharge plan.
As a participant of the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea, Japan has the obligation of protecting the marine environment.
However, it hasn’t offered a full and convincing explanation on issues like the legitimacy of the discharge plan, the reliability of data on the nuclear-contaminated water, the efficacy of the treatment system or the uncertainty of environmental impact.
Though the IAEA has yet to complete a comprehensive review after three investigations in Japan, the Japanese side has been pushing through the approval process for its discharge plan and even started building facilities for the discharge. It is rather irresponsible for Japan to act against public opinion at home and concerns abroad.
The Pacific Ocean is not a private Japanese sewer. The country must seriously heed the voices of the international community and make a reasonable plan for the Fukushima wastewater disposal after full consultation with stakeholders and international agencies.
If it only seeks instant interest and insists on discharging the contaminated water into the sea, not only itself, but also its neighboring countries and the entire world will pay for the decision and several generations will be forced to bear the consequence.
（文图：赵筱尘 巫邓炎） [责编：天天中] 阅读剩余全文（）  视觉焦点
乐发lv地图 |
)